Revenue Architecture
Model Your Scenario
Adjust assumptions to explore Valiant Quantum's revenue trajectory across four interconnected streams — from transaction fees to the Aleta unit of account.
Total Annual Revenue
—
Monthly run-rate: —
Jobs Brokered / Year
—
per month: —
Platform Take Rate
—
of total GMV
Gross Margin
—
platform revenue after COGS
Assumptions
Adjust key variables to model different outcomes
Platform Scale
Connected Backends
5
Enterprise Customers
8
Avg. Jobs / Customer / Month
80
Transaction Economics
Avg. Job Value
€200
Platform Fee
20%
Vault Surcharge / Job
€12
Subscriptions & Services
Professional Subscribers
3
Enterprise Contracts (custom)
1
Avg. Enterprise Contract Value
€8,000/mo
Prof. Services Revenue
€250K/yr
Revenue by Stream
Annual breakdown across four revenue sources
3-Year Revenue Trajectory
Projected scaling based on current assumptions
Year 1
—
Year 2
—
Year 3
—
Platform Cost Stack
End-customer price decomposition per job
QPU Compute
Backend provider pass-through
55%
Platform Fee
Broker + Arvak compilation
20%
Vault
Anonymization & compliance
7%
Garm
Analysis & optimization
13%
Contract
SLA & metering
5%
Avg. End Price
—
Valiant Revenue
—
Gross Profit / Job
—
Aleta Index
ℵ
Synthetic unit of account — cost to solve reference problems
Phase 1 — Internal
ℵ-VQE
H₂O ground-state energy
—
—
ℵ-QAOA
MaxCut 50-node graph
—
—
ℵ-Grover
Unstructured search 2²⁰
—
—
ℵ-QML
Binary classification Iris
—
—
ℵ-SIM
Heisenberg chain evolution
—
—
Aggregate Aleta (ℵ)
Weighted basket of all variants
—
—